<tr id="4U569hi"><progress id="4U569hi"><dfn id="4U569hi"></dfn></progress></tr>

<thead id="4U569hi"></thead><optgroup id="4U569hi"><del id="4U569hi"></del></optgroup>
<object id="4U569hi"></object>
<delect id="4U569hi"><rp id="4U569hi"><big id="4U569hi"></big></rp></delect><samp id="4U569hi"><del id="4U569hi"><track id="4U569hi"></track></del></samp>
<object id="4U569hi"></object><font id="4U569hi"><del id="4U569hi"></del></font><thead id="4U569hi"></thead>

Why Nuclear Plants are a safe zone from terrorist attacks

Nuclear power plant

Possible aircraft attack

There has been a lot of contemplation over the consequences of occurrence of an attack by a large aircraft similar to the 2001 World Trade Centre attack in New York. This time the target being a nuclear facility aiming at radioactive materials. Studies show that nuclear reactors would be robust as compared to any other civil installations used to resist such attacks. A thorough study financed by the US department of Energy and conducted by US Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) concluded that the US reactor would be strong enough to withstand attacks from large commercial aircraft.


Lack of Australian nuclear plant almost immoral: Peter Cosgrove

The Former defence force chief Peter Cosgrove has pleaded for Australia to embrace nuclear power, criticising the “daily scrapping” between politicians about climate change.

Addressing a business breakfast in Perth, General Cosgrove said strong action was crucial and it was “almost immoral” to export uranium to less technologically advanced and stable countries to use in nuclear power plants while refusing to have one in Australia: (more…)

Warming to Nuclear Power

The Age yesterday released an Age/Nielsen poll demonstrating that 49% of Australians believed nuclear should be on the nation’s list of potential power options, with 43% opposed.


This is a major change from a level of just 38% in a 2006 Newspoll, with 51 per cent opposed.


The Real Target is 97%

With all the political talk about emissions targets, it is hard to get a solid reference point.? Here is one such reference.? Taking?the?long term sustainable emissions level from the?Stern Review (UK?Government 2007), we find that a 97% emissions cut will ultimately be?required in Australia’s case.


亚博平衡小车| 亚博体育官网入口| 亚博zippo金| 亚博体育彩票可靠| 亚博体育能买2串一个| 亚博彩票苹果版| 天娱科技亚博体育| 万博和亚博的关系| 亚博体育正规| 亚博体育绑定银行卡| 亚博体育在哪里下载| 亚博体育竞猜网首页| 亚博体育是谁投资的| 亚博刘荣逵| 亚博体育app下载苹果版| 亚博体育官方网羽毛球| 亚博体育跑跑车| 亚博体育正规平台官网| 武汉中亚博绿| 亚博下载官网| 亚博体育下载在哪里| 亚博app地址| 亚博体育彩票app| 亚博体育88app下载| yobo体育亚博下载| 亚博体育投注中心| 菲律宾亚博| 亚博足球官网| 亚博体育通道一| 亚博体育最低投注| 亚博PC国际| 亚博单片机密码| 亚博体育地址| 类似亚博体育的软件| 亚博官方网址下载| 亚博提取密码| 亚博体育机械装备集团| 亚博和万博| 亚博娱乐官网入口| 亚博赌博app| 亚博体育官微排名| http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/cccvygMR/11630.html http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/cccVHeOk/ http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/cccmhgYO/76309.html http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/cccCdG06/ http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/cccsnMpm/79445.html http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/cccNswJ2/